This set of exemplars illustrates the use of the e-asTTle marking rubric to score writing across the writing prompts. The exemplars cover the full scoring range. asTTle Writing Rubric in Student Speak. Created by Clevedon School from asTTle Writing Rubrics. Last updated: Ideas. Learning Intention. The e asTTle framework for assessing writing. Developing the prompts, marking rubric, and annotated exemplars. Extending the usefulness.

Author: Kigadal Faejind
Country: Chad
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Personal Growth
Published (Last): 28 June 2015
Pages: 432
PDF File Size: 16.34 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.28 Mb
ISBN: 884-7-87732-644-7
Downloads: 32033
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Arajar

The Describe purpose is divided mtrix two: An e-asTTle assessment is completed in 40 minutes under test matrlx without any teacher or peer feedback, or access to writing aids such as dictionaries. The annotated exemplars are samples of student writing produced in response to each e-asTTle writing prompt.

As extra support for teachers, the Structure and Language notes for all purposes have been gathered into one document, available jatrix download below. Moving from say a R2 to a R3 will involve a large shift in the associated curriculum level. Find out about how you can accelerate student achievement by improving teacher practice in assessment for learning.

If not, look at the exemplars before and after the one you are looking at, to try and find the appropriate stage for your learner. It is best for teachers to point to the rubric scores given for each element when discussing a report with students. A rubric score on one element may have a very different meaning to a rubric score on another element.

Some prompts will suit older students because they cover topics relating to the wider world. Anna Sullivan Chief Executive. All test data from the previous version of e-asTTle writing will be available. Imprecision also needs to be taken into account when considering the curriculum level descriptor.

The conversion table should be used only when a non-standardised form of writing assessment is undertaken. To assign a category score of R4 in a particular element, the conditions for a score of R3 astrle that element must also have been met.


Writing: Moderation and things to consider

Students who score in the lowest category for every element assessed by e-asTTle writing all R1s are not well targeted by the assessment. These exemplars can be used to check interpretation of individual categories for example, wrriting R2 in spelling, or category R4 in ideas. The curriculum scores are a reference point, which link wruting test performance with the performance level that might reasonably be expected from someone working at that level.

Others will be better suited to younger students. The specific exemplars are examples of writing for the prompt being used. During the development of e-asTTle Writing, a. Teachers can find many resources to assist them with marking e-asTTle writing.

e-asTTle writing tool (revised)

Please be aware that if you are downloading documents from our site for the first time you will be asked to supply your contact details for our records. Yes, when the revised e-asTTle writing assessment becomes matris in Term 2, the new single rubric replaces the old ones. Instead, you will have to select a rubric score ranging fromor sometimes They are representative examples of writing for each prompt. What features of writing marix you notice? You can check that you have the correct version by ensuring that it is called Conversion table April — rubric scores to scale scoresor that the score of witing on the table converts to curriculum level 3B not 3A.

With well moderated scoring and proper administration e-asTTle writing has the capacity to put students into about six or seven statistically distinct bands of achievement.

However, within each category it is important to note that a minor error or glitch is allowed.

e-asTTle writing / Frequently asked questions / Home – e-asTTle

Use the writing matrix to decide which stage each learner is likely to fit into — make a ashtle decision at this stage. Take time to become familiar with the scores and characteristics of the exemplars. There are 20 prompts that cover the five writing purposes. The matrix focuses on how learners within each broad stage typically write.


Teachers can use the table to convert an e-asTTle rubric score asttlle an e-asTTle writing scale score an aWs score and curriculum level descriptor. It is not the focus of any other element. It is unwise to treat the element curriculum scores as precise measures and comparisons with the old element scores wriging be very tenuous.

This page will be updated regularly as new questions arise. Curriculum levels derived from the weiting of the conversion table will not correlate with results entered into e-asTTle because prompts in e-asTTle have been calibrated and ranked based on how difficult the prompt and purpose is to write.

Together, the rubric, the exemplars and the annotations enable consistent marking decisions to be made. In order for the e-asTTle application to calculate a scale score for a student, each element must be scored against the rubric. This should be used wditing when a non-standardised form of writing assessment is being undertaken, for instance, when:.

Rubric scores and curriculum levels are wrting different things. Module 2 – Writing. Michael Absolum Company Director. All information will be posted on e-asttle. Evaluation Associates works on a wide range of projects in collaboration with clients and partners.

The annotations explain the thinking behind each scoring decision. See Choosing a Writing Prompt for more information. Ongoing moderation of scoring decisions is necessary to ensure that scoring is consistent and accurate over time. This is the booklet which you will use throughout this module. Please click on the links below. Home Contact e-asTTle Disclaimer.

Introduction In this module you will: