A brief synoptic parallel — Taking the side of the ‘modern’ in philosophy — Old and new relations between science and philosophy — Matrices and principles. Anti-Badiou relates the parallel stories of Badiou’s Maoist ‘ontology of the void’ and Laruelle’s own performative practice of ‘non-philosophy’. : Anti-Badiou: The Introduction of Maoism into Philosophy ( ) by Francois Laruelle and a great selection of similar New, Used and.
||22 November 2012
|PDF File Size:
|ePub File Size:
||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
The ant-ibadiou traces a conceptual portrait of a Badiou that is more an artefact of Laruelle’s method than a faithful image. An important contribution of the book is its critique of the principle of mathematical sufficiency, i. Amazon Renewed Refurbished products with a warranty. A Critical Introduction to Non-Philosophytrans.
Page 1 of pnilosophy Start over Page 1 of 1. The Re-education of Philosophy by Mathematics: Undertaking a philosophical project in the genre of polemic is always dangerous.
Learn more about Amazon Prime. Much of this work was motivated by an attempt to respond to the various criticisms and perceived weaknesses of the first volume. See Peter Osborne, “Neo-Classic: We require further details as to the new version of non-philosophy, and as to the analytic means that will allow us to detect in Badiou the indestructible residue of philosophy, and its conservation-reeducation by Cantor and Mao under the sign of Plato.
Decision for Badiou is after the event, introductipn a path opens up by chance.
Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon. Sign in Create an account. The scope then, for Laruelle, merely exists because each of these domains is another bit of material that can be used. Non-philosophy is then another variant of antiphilosophy, that which speculates on non-thought as thought?
A brief synoptic parallel — Taking the side of the ‘modern’ in philosophy — Old and new relations between science and philosophy — Matrices and principles — Subtraction and superposition — Philosophy and mathematics in the mirror — Ontology and materiality — Philo-fiction. Laruelle gently mocks the notion that there are four — just these four — truth-conditions, and he points out he is not the first or only one to do so.
Bloomsbury Academic; Reprint edition February 28, Language: In this text Laruelle wagers a polemic despite those risks and engages with Badiou by aping the latter’s own polemical style to uncover what he sees as the authoritarian nature of Badiou’s philosophy. In short, philosophy appears as a helicopter parent, always speaking for the ignorant maojsm who does not know what is good for it and never will. This compelling and highly original book represents a confrontation between two of the most radical thinkers at work in France today: Most of his targets, however, have not been philosophers of talent equal to his own, and so he has rarely risked as much as Laruelle does here.
If the risk of a polemic is that the polemicist falls flat in his own writing, Laruelle quite deftly does not try to meet Badiou punch for punch. Ati-badiou, it is an essential possibility of philosophy, one that philosophy makes available alongside others; a possibility first actualized by Plato, but one that is profoundly inscribed in the very axioms of philosophical decision, albeit more or less inert or apparently inactive at any given time.
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Michel Serres is perhaps exemplary in this case: These functors, as used by Laruelle and many others, are useful in orienting toward a new aperture, not as a tool to be folded back into the system. Anti-Badiou relates the parallel stories of Badiou’s Maoist ‘ontology of the void’ and Laruelle’s own performative practice of ‘non-philosophy’ and explains why the two are in fact radically different.
Up until Badiou, philosophy was educative and pedagogical; with him, it is re-educated by mathematics.
In “Matrices and Principles” he develops the differences in what could be anti-badiu meta-philosophy for the two thinkers. Badiou’s entire project aims to re-educate philosophy through one science: It is worth noting that pgilosophy these chapters Laruelle’s aping of Badiou’s polemical style is fully displayed and that many of the most entertaining lines are found here. What results is a true disagreement, the first in a very long time.
In response to the previous review I’d point philoophy that in Principles of Non-Philosophy Laruelle specifically targets Badious “anti-philosophy” as remaining within the principle of sufficient philosophy and as auto-positional.
Adrian Johnston – – Contemporary French Civilization 33 1: He continues, saying, The Real of immanence, by virtue of the particle that it configures, is the non-dialectical solution to contradiction and to antinomies. But what we also see in this final chapter is the scope of non-philosophy, a scope ingo moves from what we would normally refer to as meta-philosophy, to epistemology, then to philosophy of religion, and finally to ethics and political philosophy.
Short note on Laruelle’s Anti-Badiou | Break The Code
You are commenting using your Facebook account. In turn, Laruelle explains the contrast with his own non-philosophy as a true democracy of thought that breaks philosophy’s continual enthrall with mathematics and instead opens up a myriad of ‘non-standard’ places where thinking can od found and practised.
Read more Read less. Selected pages Title Page. Every single flower in the dream has own meaning:. As a polemicist Laruelle is entertaining, often times using self-deprecation as a weapon, such as when he inti, “we need only consider Badiou in himself to see that he is a technically irreproachable philosopher, and an intelligence in excess of us in every way” xxxix.
Being and Event Bloomsbury Revelations. Alain Badiou – – Bloomsbury Academic.