emergence, the literature on multiple modernities focuses almost exclusively on sely, a multiplicity of such programs, not an institutional reality (Eisenstadt. Shmuel Noah Eisenstadt (Hebrew: שמואל נח אייזנשטדט) (10 September , Warsaw – 2 than on uniform process of development” Eisenstadt researched broad themes of social change, modernities and civilizations. Weil, S. b ‘ On Multiple Modernities, Civilizations and Ancient Judaism: an Interview with Prof . Authors and chapters include: S.N. Eisenstadt,”Multiple Modernities”; Bjrn Wittrock, “Modernity: One, None, orMany? European Origins and Modernity as a .
||27 November 2009
|PDF File Size:
|ePub File Size:
||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Miscegenation, transnational migration,technological developments, and changing communications have shifted the ground on whichtheories of society were once built; political system, diaspora groups, religion, and”classical” theories of modernity have to be reconsidered in a newcontext. In most institutional spheres there continued to develop many formal, large-scale organizations cutting across various ecological, eieenstadt, and castlike groups.
Umltiple volume is of interest to sociologists, ethnologists, political scientists, and social anthropologists. Eisenstadt stayed at the Hebrew University and began teaching there, served as the Chairman of the Department of Sociology from toand also served as Dean of the Faculty of Humanities for a few years.
With the onset of modernization such coalescence tended to weaken.
Although the new national symbol usually had a distinct territorial referent, and often a kinship, it was much more abstract and mythical and much less traditional and included many more subgroups of various kinds. But even totalitarian regimes attempt to legitimize themselves in terms of such values, and it is impossible to understand their policies, their attempts to create symbols of mass consensus, without assuming the existence of such consensual tendency among the major strata within them and its acknowledgement by the rulers.
Multiple Modernities Shmuel N. Essay Anmerkungen und Literatur Quelle n.
In other projects Wikimedia Commons. Eliezer Ben-Rafael and Yitzhak Sternberg. Can looking at thediverse paths followed by various cultures in the modern world generate useful new socialscientific typologies, or must a different set of questions be posed in this era ofglobaliation? Retrieved from ” https: Duke University Press, In the political sphere modernization has been characterized, first, by growing extension of the territorial scope and especially by the intensification of the power of the central, legal, administrative, and political agencies of the society.
Unlike the rulers of traditional autocratic regimes, the rulers of the totalitarian regimes accept the relevance of their subjects as the objects and beneficiaries, legitimators of policy. Third, modern societies are in some sense democratic or at least populistic societies.
Free Press of Glencoe, Inc. But these discrepancies continually brought together various groups of the population into common frameworks, increasing their interdependence on the one hand and their pressures on the central institutional sphere of the society on the other.
The nonascriptive regulators are characterized by the fact that they occupy their positions by virtue of some achieved position — either by being chosen to represent other people or groups, or by mutliple of their ownership of special capital, or of some specific knowledge expertise.
The Basic Characteristics of Modernizationin: Eisenstadt summed up his views by saying “I try to understand what was the historical experience of the great civilizations Out of the modernitiws of these varied pressures there developed the basic structural characteristics of educational institutions or systems in modern societies.
Modernizing the Middle East, Glencoe Modern societies are also highly differentiated and specialized with respect to individual activities and institutional structures.
Multiple modernities – Shmuel Noah Eisenstadt – Google Books
He is moderniities editor-in-chief of ProtoSociology: Gerhard Preyer and Michael Sussmann. Michael Sussman has published many articles on international security, counter terrorism, foreign policy strategy, decision making, predictive analysis, and the Middle East.
Dieser Blick auf die Moderne impliziert, dass diese als eine sich neu herausbildende Form von Kultur zu sehen ist, analog etwa zur Entstehung und Verbreitung der Weltreligionen. The studies in this book converge to demonstrate that the route of Western modernization, its cultural program and its institutional structure, does not follow the pathway of modernization that we have thus far observed in the emerged new area.
Varieties of Multiple Modernities
What, in short, is the nature of modernity? Following the theme in anearlier work edited by Shmuel Eisenstadt, Public Spheres and CollectiveIdentities, this book challenges conventional notions of how the world haschanged politically, socially, and economically.
Free Press of Glencoe, Inc. My library Help Advanced Book Search.
In the first stages of modernization these various international trends converged mostly around problems of formation and crystallization of national communities and symbols. How may we characterie contemporary society in a world so complex? Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities